No. 21-6718
Gregory Chester and William Ford v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi apprendi-doctrine conspiracy-sentencing criminal-procedure grand-jury indictment presentment-clause sentencing statutory-sentencing superseding-indictment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Presentment Clause requires grand jury special findings to justify increased statutory sentencing range
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether, where Apprendi and its progeny requires the petit jury to return special findings as to individual conspiracy defendants to justify an increase in their statutory sentencing range, the Presentment Clause also requires that those same special findings be returned by the grand jury and pleaded in an indictment. I Whether a superseding indictment replaces all earlier indictments in the case once the trial begins.
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 24, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent