Whether the Federal Tort Claims Act's limitation on contingency fees violates the First Amendment right to petition the government

Questions Presented to the Justices of the United States Supreme Court : First Question: Given the fact that the Constitution of the United States, Amendment f reads in pertinent ‘ part that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging . . . the right of the people . . . to petition the Government for redress of grievances,” what gives Congress the authority to legislatively interfere and prohibitively limit, by provisions of Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) § 2678, any and every citizen’s right to freely negotiate a contingency fee arrangement with an attorney of plaintiff's choice in a FTCA lawsuit? : ! . | | Second Question: In strict compliance with the U. S. Supreme Court precedent in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 | U.S. 662, 678-679 (2009), was it not an abuse of discretion for the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals | to refuse to consider newly found and specifically relevant dispositive evidence completely discrediting the invalid syllogism of fact and law created by the Magistrate Judge in the Screening Order which led ; directly to the unjust dismissal of Petitioner's legitimate FTCA lawsuit? ; | | i | | | Page Questions Presented of Table Of