No. 21-646

Oklahoma v. Dameon Lamar Leathers

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-11-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-jurisdiction precedent-challenge stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals No. F-2019-962 Dameon Lamar Leathers, Appellant v. The State of Oklahoma, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: August 5, 2021 Oklahoma District Court (Tulsa County) No. CF-2018-1340 The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. Dameon Lamar Leathers, Defendant Date of Judgment and Sentence: December 2, 2019

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-16
Brief of respondent Dameon L. Leathers in opposition filed.
2021-12-16
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Dameon L. Leathers.
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 16, 2021.
2021-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 2, 2021 to December 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-24
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2021)

Attorneys

Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross NimmoCherokee Nation, Amicus
Chrissi Ross NimmoCherokee Nation, Amicus
Dameon L. Leathers
Zachary Charles SchaufJenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Zachary Charles SchaufJenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun MansinghaniSolicitor General, Petitioner
Mithun MansinghaniSolicitor General, Petitioner