No. 21-502
Oklahoma v. Terrance Lucas Cottingham
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Takings
Takings
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals No. F-2017-1294 Terrance Lucas Cottingham, Appellant v. The State of Oklahoma, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: May 6, 2021 Oklahoma District Court (Washington County) No. CF-2015-350 The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. Terrance Cottingham, Defendant Date of Judgment and Sentence: December 13, 2017
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-18
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-11-04
Brief of respondent Terrance L. Cottingham in opposition filed.
2021-11-04
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Terrance L. Cottingham.
2021-10-29
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Terrance L. Cottingham
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent