No. 21-6670
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administration-of-justice bank-robbery beyond-reasonable-doubt criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-jurisdiction fifth-circuit jury-conviction standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appeals court conducted an adequate review of facts and evidence upon which the jury reached its decision to convict
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is as follows: t Whether the appeals court conducted an adequate review of facts and evidence upon which the jury reached its decision to convict. Because the proper weighing of the evidence and the application of the beyond reasonable doubt standard of review is of exceptional importance to the administration of justice in federal criminal cases, this Court should grant certiorari in this case to decide this question and, and upon review, should reverse the judgment of the Fifth Circuit. | | | |
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2022)
Attorneys
Eric Beverly
Yolanda Evette Jarmon — Law Office of Yolanda Jarmon, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent