Whether Alvarado's conviction qualifies as a violent crime

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I, WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE COURT'S RULING IN BORDEN V. UNITED STATES, 593 U.S, (2021), ALVARADO’S CONVICTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. 8111(a) AND (b) QUALIFIES AS A VIOLENT CRIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 8924(c)? I]. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S SUA SPONTE ASSERTION OF THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF "INEVITABLE DISCOVERY” VIOLATES THIS COURT’S PRONOUNCEMENT IN GREENLAW V, UNITED STATES, 554 U.S. 237, 243-244, 128 S.CT, 2559, 171 L.ED, 2D 399 (2008)? II]. WHETHER THE USE OF A RUSE, IN ORDER 10 OBTAIN CONSENT TO SEARCH A HOME, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES AT BAR, VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? IV. WHETHER IN LIGHT OF THE ISSUES IN THIS CASE, JURISTS COULD DISAGREE WITH THE DISTRICT COURT’S RESOLUTION OF ALVARADO'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS UNDER SLACK V, MCDANIEL, 529 U.S.. 473, 484 (2000), AND MILLER-EL_V, COCKRELL, 537 U.S, 322, 336 (2003), AND WHETHER COA SHOULD ISSUE?