No. 21-6656
Azizjon Rakhmatov v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-waiver constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process equal-protection guilty-plea plea-agreement right-to-appeal right-to-counsel sentencing-bias
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment Punishment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a sentence based on racial and ethnic bias can be appealed pursuant to the Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws, to counsel, and against cruel and unusual punishment, and the statutory right to appeal, notwithstanding an appellate waiver in a guilty plea agreement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether a sentence based on racial and ethnic bias can be appealed pursuant to the Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws, to counsel, and against cruel and unusual punishment, and the statutory right to appeal, notwithstanding an appellate waiver in a guilty plea agreement? i
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Azizjon Rakhmatov
Lawrence Stern — Law Office of Lawrence Mark Stern, Petitioner
Lawrence Stern — Law Office of Lawrence Mark Stern, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent