Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision of the Fifth Circuit conflicts with decisions of this Court on an eligibility for safety-valve reduction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”)-which affirmed the decision of the District Court that Ms. Harvey constructively possessed a firearm and therefore was not eligible for a safety-valve reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)-conflicts with decisions of this Court on an important matter, and thus the decision by the Fifth Circuit calls for an exercise of this Court’s supervisory powers such that a compelling reason is presented in support of discretionary review by this Honorable Court.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-31
Reply of petitioner Diandra Harvey filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-20
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 20, 2021.
2021-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 19, 2021 to December 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 19, 2021.
2021-10-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2021 to November 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-20
Response Requested. (Due October 20, 2021)
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)