Whether summary reversal is warranted

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether summary reversal is warranted where the Seventh Circuit did not consider this case in light of Espinoza v. Montana Dep't of Revenue, 591 US. __, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (2020) as ordered by this Court on July 2, 2020. 2. Whether summary reversal is warranted where the Seventh Circuit concluded that an overlapping state remedy rendered unnecessary resolution of the Petitioners’ federal constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in compliance with this Court’s mandate. 3. Whether summary reversal is warranted where the Seventh Circuit declined to hold that the Petitioners’ First Amendment rights were violated, despite agreeing that the Respondents withheld from the Petitioners otherwise-available public benefits “for reasons that can be tied to [the Petitioners’] religious preference” and following a “doctrinal determination” by the government. App. 4a, 14a.