No. 21-1470

Curtis Chun v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights employment employment-lawsuit fitness-to-proceed hawaii hawaii-law judicial-tolling statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court and the Court of Appeals failed to properly consider the full extent of Petitioner's lack of fitness to proceed in unrelated State of Hawaii Criminal Proceedings in determining whether the applicable Statute of Limitations was tolled in Petitioner's Civil Rights Employment Lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the District Court and the Court of Appeals failed to properly consider the full extent of Petitioner’s lack of fitness to proceed in unrelated State of Hawaii Criminal Proceedings in determining whether the applicable Statute of Limitations was tolled in Petitioner’s Civil Rights Employment Lawsuit against the City and County of Honolulu? ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Chun v. City and County of Honolulu, No. 18-00131 JMS-RT United States District Court For the District of Hawai’i Judgment entered July 13, 2020 Chun v. City and County of Honolulu, No. 20-16558 United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit Opinion entered February 18, 2022

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-13
Waiver of right of respondent City and County of Honolulu, HI to respond filed.
2022-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2022)

Attorneys

City and County of Honolulu, HI
Nicolette WinterDept. of the Corporation Counsel, C&C of Honolulu, Respondent
Curtis Chun
Shawn Anthony LuizShawn A. Luiz, Attorney at Law, Petitioner