No. 21-481
Betty R. Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, et al.
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure federal-courts jurisdiction notice-of-removal procedural-defect remand removal reply statutory-authority
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order remanding a case to state court based on a procedural defect, when the plaintiff files a motion to remand within 30 days of the notice of removal but articulates the procedural defect in a reply more than 30 days after the notice of removal
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order remanding a case to state court based on a procedural defect, when the plaintiff files a motion to remand within 30 days of the notice of removal but articulates the procedural defect in a reply more than 30 days after the notice of removal.
Docket Entries
2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-27
Reply of petitioner Betty R. Shipley filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-13
Brief of respondents Helping Hands Therapy, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2021.
2021-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 1, 2021 to December 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Betty R. Shipley
David A. O'Neil — Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, Petitioner
David A. O'Neil — Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, Petitioner
Helping Hands Therapy, et al.
Scott Samuel Brown — Mixon Firm, LLC, Respondent
Scott Samuel Brown — Mixon Firm, LLC, Respondent