| 21-418 |
Joseph A. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (68)Relisted (2) |
constitutional-rights establishment-clause first-amendment free-exercise free-speech public-employment public-school religious-expression |
1. Whether a public-school employee who says a brief, quiet prayer by himself while at school and visible to students is engaged in government speech … |
79.0 |
| 21-499 |
Carlos Vega v. Terence B. Tekoh |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (14)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights civil-rights-act fifth-amendment law-enforcement miranda-v-arizona miranda-warnings police-liability section-1983 self-incrimination |
Whether a plaintiff may state a claim for relief against a law enforcement officer under Section 1983 based simply on an officer's failure to provide … |
28.5 |
| 21-164 |
Trustees of the New Life In Christ Church v. City of Fredericksburg, Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (10) |
church-autonomy church-state-separation civil-authority civil-rights establishment-clause first-amendment free-speech ministerial-exception ministerial-exemption property-tax religious-doctrine religious-freedom |
Virginia law provides an exemption from property taxes for "[r]eal property and personal property owned by churches * * * and exclusively occupied or … |
21.0 |
| 21-118 |
Apple Inc. v. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-rulemaking federal-circuit inter-partes-review judicial-review leahy-smith-america-invents-act mandamus-petition patent patent-review uspto |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may review, by appeal or mandamus, a decision of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office denying … |
19.0 |
| 21-234 |
Kevin R. George v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (8)Relisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-interpretation clear-and-unmistakable-error clear-unmistakable-error disability-claim plain-meaning pro-veteran-system statutory-interpretation veterans-benefits |
When the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denies a veteran's claim for benefits in reliance on an agency interpretation that is later deemed invali… |
19.0 |
| 21-439 |
Michael Nance v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
alternative-execution civil-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus lethal-injection method-of-execution ripeness section-1983 successive-petition |
1. Whether an inmate's as-applied method-of-execution challenge must be raised in a habeas petition instead of through a § 1983 action if the inmate p… |
18.0 |
| 21-511 |
Tim Shoop, Warden v. Raymond A. Twyford, III |
Sixth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (7)Relisted (2) |
all-writs-act circuit-split evidentiary-development federal-court habeas-corpus state-prisoner state-prisoners statutory-interpretation transportation writ-of-transportation |
1. 28 U.S.C. §2241(c) allows federal courts to issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering the transportation of a state prisoner only when necessary to br… |
18.0 |
| 21-495 |
Dennis Black, et al. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure due-process erisa judicial-oversight pbgc pension-plan pension-termination statutory-interpretation |
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") carefully spells out the process to terminate a distressed pension plan insured by the Pension B… |
17.5 |
| 21-537 |
Adir International, LLC, et al. v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Company |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment insurance insurance-proceeds legal-defense standing state-action state-litigation |
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a State to prohibit private parties from using untainted funds, such as otherwise l… |
12.5 |
| 21-269 |
Anthony Carter v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
controlled-substances criminal-conviction drug-possession jackson-standard jackson-v-virginia molecular-structure statutory-interpretation sufficiency-analysis technical-elements |
In a sufficiency analysis under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), may a reviewing court uphold a conviction where the offense is defined by te… |
11.0 |
| 21-481 |
Betty R. Shipley v. Helping Hands Therapy, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure federal-courts jurisdiction notice-of-removal procedural-defect remand removal reply statutory-authority |
Whether the court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order remanding a case to state court based on a procedural defect, when the plaintiff file… |
10.5 |
| 21-202 |
Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-314 35-usc-315 administrative-law appellate-jurisdiction inter-partes-review judicial-review nhk-fintiv-rule patent-trial-and-appeal-board patent-trial-and-appeals-board statutory-interpretation |
1. Does 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) categorically preclude appeal of all decisions not to institute inter partes review?
2. Is the NHK-Fintiv Rule substantive… |
9.0 |
| 21-427 |
William Frederick Lamoureux v. Montana |
Montana |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-law content-based-restriction criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech overbreadth overbreadth-doctrine speech-regulation |
Whether a statute that criminalizes speech intended to annoy or offend is unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment. |
9.0 |
| 21-726 |
Augustin Torres Gonzalez v. Steven Hahl, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arrest-standard civil-rights due-process false-arrest investigative-procedure judicial-review law-enforcement malicious-prosecution pendent-jurisdiction probable-cause state-policy totality-of-circumstances |
1. The Panel found arguable probable cause to
arrest and prosecute petitioner for the felony of sexual
abuse in the first degree under New York law wi… |
8.5 |
| 21-267 |
James Garfield Broadnax v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
28-usc-2254 batson-challenge cullen-v-pinholster evidentiary-hearing federal-review habeas-corpus prosecutorial-discretion racial-discrimination statutory-interpretation |
Whether, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) and Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), a federal habeas petitioner may present evidence of a prosecutor's r… |
7.0 |
| 21-552 |
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al. v. Edward Anderson, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
chadbourne-v-troice circuit-split covered-securities in-connection-with merrill-lynch-v-dabit securities-exchange-act securities-litigation slusa statutory-interpretation uniform-standards-act |
Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with other Courts of Appeals, erred in concluding that Troice narrowed Dabit's interpretation of SLUSA's "in co… |
6.5 |
| 21-5714 |
Jayren Jakar Wynn v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
agency-deference agency-interpretation circuit-precedent controlled-substance-offense guideline-commentary inchoate-offenses kisor-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines |
Whether a circuit court may properly rely on circuit precedent predating Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019), to hold, contrary to Kisor, that the… |
6.0 |
| 21-674 |
North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees v. Maxwell Kadel, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
11th-amendment civil-rights discrimination-waiver eleventh-amendment federal-financial-assistance rehabilitation-act sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation |
Section 1003 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986 provides that a State "shall not be immune under the Eleventh Amendment . . . from suit in F… |
5.5 |
| 21-693 |
Nina Rae Ringgold v. United States District Court for the Central District of California |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-agency civil-rights civil-rights-act discriminatory-retaliation due-process judicial-disqualification jurisdiction standing supremacy-clause voting-rights-act |
1. When there is undisputed evidence that a non-court state administrative agency lacks jurisdiction under federal law, whether the Ninth Circuit can … |
5.5 |
| 21-699 |
Collette Campbell v. We Transport, Inc., et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
beneficiary-designation cat-paw-doctrine death-benefits employer-duties erisa erisa-claims-procedures fiduciary-duty fraud insurance-carrier-duties insurance-claim |
1. Whether the "Cat's Paw Doctrine" is applicable in this case when established claims procedures in an ERISA group insurance claim are not followed w… |
5.5 |
| 21-703 |
RLR Investments, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exxon-mobil fifth-amendment interlocutory-order property-taking rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-order takings |
After Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005), is it improper for a United States District Court to dismiss claims brou… |
5.5 |
| 21-710 |
Valerie Jackson v. Lupe Valdez, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
28-usc-144 28-usc-455 appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether a district court may disregard this Court's precedent and the plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 144, review and rebut the merits of an affidavit s… |
5.5 |
| 21-727 |
Robert R. Snyder v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts active-interference civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process law-library-access plausibility-standard prisoner-rights procedural-due-process prospective-relief standing |
Did the lower court's incorrectly apply Christopher v. Harbury in its attempt justify the dismissal of Petitioner's Active Interference claims? Does H… |
5.5 |
| 21-730 |
'Lanre O. Amu v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission |
Illinois |
Denied |
|
attorney-discipline civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fair-hearing freedom-of-press freedom-of-speech judicial-misconduct racial-discrimination |
1. Whether in light of the public Oaths taken in
The Name of God to faithfully and impartially discharge
the duties of the office, the seven Justice… |
5.5 |
| 21-731 |
Jesse Plasola v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
5-cfr-1653-2-b-1 court-jurisdiction divorce-decree federal-employees-retirement-system federal-employees-retirement-system-act-of-1986 judicial-jurisdiction retirement-benefits thrift-savings-plan zero-balance zero-balance-account |
(1) The Congress recognized, during passage of the 1986 FERSA, that a Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) account that has a zero balance is not subject to cour… |
5.5 |
| 21A198 |
Lucas Wall, et al. v. Transportation Security Administration |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 21-903 |
Robert M. Glen v. American Airlines, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
civil-procedure confiscated-property cuban-property helms-burton-act inheritance-rights private-right-of-action property-confiscation standing statutory-interpretation trafficking trafficking-claims |
Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, 22 U.S.C. § 6081 et seq., is a broad remedial statute that authorizes U.S. nationals whose property was confiscated… |
4.5 |
| 21-62 |
Paul Poupart v. Louisiana, et al. |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
collateral-review constitutional-violation cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process ex-post-facto fraud-on-the-court fraud-upon-court retrospective state-collateral-review |
Has the State of Louisiana and its Judicial Officers created and/or imposed an ex post facto law violating the Petitioner's federal due process rights… |
4.0 |
| 21-708 |
CLMS Management Services Limited Partnership, et al. v. Amwins Brokerage of Georgia, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbitration-provision federal-arbitration-act foreign-insurer insurance-regulation mandatory-arbitration mccarran-ferguson-act preemption reverse-preemption state-insurance-regulation state-law |
Whether a provision of state law prohibiting mandatory arbitration in a policy of insurance issued by a foreign insurer is preempted by the Federal Ar… |
3.5 |
| 21-765 |
In Re Kelaco Corporation, dba Kelaco Construction Company |
|
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts appellate-review due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment |
Where a Florida state appellate court finds enough merit to an appeal such that it holds an oral argument but, after the oral argument, refuses to iss… |
3.5 |
| 21-865 |
Deborah Walton v. First Merchants Bank |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
60(b)-motion 7th-circuit-court appeals civil-procedure district-court due-process final-order jurisdiction procedural-due-process |
Whether the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals neglected to apply procedural due process in accordance with the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, by not acce… |
3.5 |
| 21-5952 |
Robert Paul Rundo, Robert Boman, Tyler Laube, and Aaron Eason v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)IFP |
18-usc-2101 anti-riot-act brandenburg-v-ohio civil-rights constitutional-interpretation first-amendment free-speech interstate-commerce overt-act riot speech-restriction |
Whether the Anti-Riot Act is facially unconstitutional, because it cannot be interpreted, faithful to its plain text and consistent with congressional… |
1.5 |
| 21-5975 |
Modesto Balderas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
GVR |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act borden-v-united-states criminal-procedure records-of-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement simple-robbery texas-penal-code violent-felony |
Whether the Texas offense of Simple Robbery, Tex. Penal Code §29.02(a) constitutes a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. §… |
0.5 |
| 21-6538 |
In Re Kenny Blanc |
|
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2244 28-usc-2255 collateral-review constitutional-law federal-prisoners gatekeeping gatekeeping-requirements habeas-corpus merits prima-facie prima-facie-showing |
To satisfy the gatekeeping requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C) and 2255(h)(2), must federal prisoners make a prima facie showing that their 28 … |
0.5 |
| 21-6257 |
Jevon Dion Jackson v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
as-applied-challenge eddings-v-oklahoma eighth-amendment juvenile-sentencing life-without-parole miller-rule miller-v-alabama proportionality proportionality-review youth-mitigation |
1. Whether a sentencing court adequately considers the mitigating aspects of youth where it considers at least some of those aspects to be aggravating… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6539 |
In Re Kenny Blanc |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2244 28-usc-2255 circuit-split collateral-review federal-prisoners gatekeeping gatekeeping-requirements habeas-corpus merits prima-facie prima-facie-showing |
To satisfy the gatekeeping requirements of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C) and 2255(h)(2), must federal prisoners make a prima facie showing that their 28 … |
-1.5 |
| 20-6531 |
Rogelio May Ruiz v. David Baughman, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Rehearing |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights due-process equal-protection reopening-case standing |
Ninth carcuit commited Discimination Raial
Why
1
Deneriag Counsel interprer for access to the courts.
PlaintiFF
Request appointment of counsel
T any c… |
-4.0 |
| 21-5442 |
Jasper Crook v. Robin Shea |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
10th-amendment 14th-amendment 42-usc-1981 7th-amendment 9th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights defamation-claim equal-protection judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation treason-allegation |
1. If beneficiaries of the United States Constitution have the right to
prosecute in their own name under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution
pr… |
-4.0 |
| 21-5469 |
Ziahonna Teagan v. City of McDonough, Georgia |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process heck-doctrine judicial-authority judicial-power municipal-liability policy-practice-procedure-custom section-1983 state-law state-law-offense |
Can a Georgia Municipality be held liable for an official, agent, or entity actions that makes a deliberate choice to follow an internal official poli… |
-4.0 |
| 21-5698 |
Jasper Crook v. Ricardo Aguilar, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts access-to-justice case-closure civil-rights court-fees due-process free-speech judicial-procedure judicial-process legal-rights ninth-circuit |
Petitioner has a right to "free justice and open courts ". NO fee needed to have Ninth Circuit hear a matter. Case cannot be closed due to fee(s) not … |
-4.0 |
| 21-5671 |
Vicente Corona v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-3553 18-usc-3582 compassionate-release criminal-sentencing extraordinary-compelling-reasons sentencing-disparities sentencing-reduction sentencing-reform statutory-interpretation |
Whether "Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons" to Reduce a Defendant's Sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) may be based on any Factor a Court … |
-4.5 |
| 21-5960 |
Alexander Davis v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actus-reus attempt attempt-offense criminal-law criminal-statute entrapment overt-act predisposition substantial-step |
1. Whether the requirement of a "substantial step" can be satisfied by conduct occurring after the alleged attempt has ended.
2. Whether a defendant'… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6221 |
David Jackson v. Massachusetts Department of Correction |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech prisoner-rights protected-speech racial-discrimination solitary-confinement true-threat |
Whether the petitioner, a senior African American prisoner complaining about systemic racism in a letter he mailed to the governor of Massachusetts at… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6236 |
L. B. Joseph v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights conviction-reversal criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief reasonable-doubt testimony |
WAS DEFENDANT GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL?
WAS DEFENDANT FOUND CGUILTY BEYOND A RESONABLE DOUBT?
WAS PERJURED TESTMONY GIVEN TO COVER UP THE TRUTH?
WERE FAR… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6237 |
Glenn C. Damond v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment juvenile-offenders life-without-parole non-homicide-offenses |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-6241 |
Eric J. Turner v. Richard L. Broch |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-rules-of-evidence habeas-corpus legal-competency mental-competency schizophrenia |
Whether the trial court failed to order a determination of the defendant's schizophrenia?
Whether a conviction that violates due process happened whi… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6244 |
Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr. v. Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process federal-habeas federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus state-court-conviction state-court-proceedings |
IS A STATE FEDERAL HABEAS PETITIONER PURSUANT TO A PROCEEDING UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C SECTION 2241 REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TO A… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6246 |
Noble Leroy Johnson v. Hazel Peterson, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal due-process standing |
Whether The District Court Erred In Summarily Dismissing Petitioner KSA.60-1507 Motion |
-4.5 |
| 21-6248 |
Oliver Vaughn Douce Al Dey v. New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-review precedent statutory-interpretation |
1/Whether federal court U.S. judge bias abuse discretion. Or error over look 28 USC 1441
2/Whether IV-D agency may deprive a parent, daughter of fit … |
-4.5 |
| 21-6258 |
Ramiro Romero v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
andrus-v-texas appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigation strickland strickland-standard |
Whe.h? a-n 0uH~Oisyy&y ZtitTtct/s Jh Y&StJgfi-tiOh? JLhottasds *tO
/hte.t'lsieu/ a. ofe'fihoLiutts t^s/tsted hriTtitss&s bec^s^ the. fcttoshty
Mfstfrf… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6271 |
Austin Myers v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts criminal-procedure death-penalty discovery due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction postconviction-relief summary-dismissal |
I. Do the Ohio state courts deny a death-sentenced postconviction petitioner's rights to due process, access to the Ohio courts, and an adequate corre… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6281 |
Mac Truong v. Rosemary I. Mergenthaler, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-authority appeal-consolidation bankruptcy-procedure barton-doctrine constitutional-rights due-process false-findings justice obstruction-of-justice subject-matter-jurisdiction trustee-immunity |
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (USCA3 hereafter) criminally obstruct justice and/or abuse and/or exceed its legal author… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6288 |
Tina L. Wagoner v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction standing |
trial preceedings were govered loy the propur appticaftion of lawi
to fac in regdrd to jurisdiction, application of legalterms used to
describe a part… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6291 |
Zoltan Barati v. Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
case-dismissal circuit-split constitutional-rights dismissal-standard due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-oversight qui-tam relator sequoia-dismissal |
Whether the 11th Circuit can eliminate due process requirements of Qui Tam - relator progressed - case dismissals while other circuits rely on Sequoia… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6293 |
Roy Bolinger v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
collateral-attack cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel victim-allocution |
1. Bolinger raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
on direct appeal. The Texas court of appeals concluded that,
without counsel's explain… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6299 |
Daryl Cook v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights collusion conspiracy conspiracy-prosecution constitutional-rights due-process legislative-immunity political-association prosecutorial-discretion standing |
Whether the procedure due process violations described in Petitioner's federal Complaint caused the settlement in the state court to be void AB INITIO… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6301 |
Travis Wayne Bentley v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing expert-witnesses fourteenth-amendment indian-federal-law indigenous-rights indigent-legal-counsel post-conviction-relief tribal-jurisdiction |
1) Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals violate Mr. Bentley's Fourteenth Amendment right to Due Process by affirming the district court's Denial… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6302 |
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-action immigration language-access public-officials retaliation |
p4! on prom m a(c\ Ce<">-br?( /lic<\.
/Mo*Vv'oo 4~o WN-V^d^awl G^i'lV Pi#**- Q^d
\Mca4eJ 4h* Q,>ecau^
On K°ow/^ "Hios'f
q^J PuLl^c &et*«J'eh ytyf^W c… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6304 |
Neng Por Yang v. Ann Marie Holland |
Minnesota |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 4th-amendment due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment harassment-restraining-order judicial-jurisdiction pro-se |
1. Whether the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision to continue the enforcement of a fraudulent and pretentious state harassment restraining order to a… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6307 |
Donald James Smith v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-case capital-punishment criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment fair-trial penalty-phase prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment victim-impact |
Was petitioner's right to a fair "penalty phase" trial violated when the prosecutor told the jurors, during closing arguments in the guilt phase, that… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6316 |
Clayton G. Walker v. Steve Barnett, South Dakota Secretary of State, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
ballot-access candidate-selection constitutional-rights election-law election-process equal-protection freedom-of-association independent-candidates major-parties third-party |
1. Should Walker as a Governor Candidate be able to choose from any party to join him in
the nomination to be on the ballot just as the rights of Majo… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6317 |
Clayton G. Walker v. Steve Barnett, South Dakota Secretary of State, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-interpretation candidate-rights constitutional-access election election-rights equal-protection judicial-procedure jurisdiction mask-mandate writ-of-mandamus |
1. Should everyone have the same Access During the Pandemic.
2. Should Walker as a Candidate for United States Sente be grated the same rights as oth… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6326 |
Farand Skinner v. Kentucky |
Kentucky |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment napue-v-illinois prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-review |
1. Did the Kentucky Supreme Court violate Mr. Skinner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and issue a decision contra… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6331 |
Byron White v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
collateral-review criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction mcgirt-decision post-conviction-relief procedural-defenses retroactivity subject-matter-jurisdiction teague-exception tribal-sovereignty |
WHETHER RESPONDENT WAIVED/FORFEITED ANY OF IT'S PROCEDURAL DEFENSES IN McGIRT'S DECISION AND RESPONDENT IS PROCEDURALLY BARRED FROM ASSERTING ANY IF I… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6340 |
Troy Wayne Harmon v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights court-of-appeals criminal-procedure evidence evidence-rules fourteenth-amendment inconsistent-opinion informant-privilege material-witness sixth-amendment |
1. The trial court refused to allow Petitioner to call a material
witness that could significantly aid in his defense -and complied
with the Rules O… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6350 |
Michael J. Greene v. Shelby Searls, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-law criminal-procedure custody due-process plea-agreement sentencing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-6354 |
Erik Mishiyev v. Alphabet Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment censorship civil-rights content-moderation due-process first-amendment free-speech platform-liability standing youtube-censorship |
Whether The United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit Order allowed YouTube to deprive the Petitioner of his Due Process rights under the 1… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6356 |
Felipe Nieves-Perez v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment indictment life-sentence motion-to-quash right-to-due-process trial-court |
I. DID THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATE MR. NIEVES-PEREZ'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BY DENYING HIS MOTION TO QUASH THE INDICTMENT?
II. DOES THE LIFE SENTENCE IMPO… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6698 |
In Re Carlton West II |
|
Denied |
IFP |
due-process equitable-rule equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-rule prisoner-rights procedural-default standing trevino-precedent |
EXACTLY HOW, WHEN AND WHERE ARE PRISONERS TO USE THE NEW EQUITABLE RULE ANNOUNCED IN MARTINEZ V. RYAN 566 U.S. 1 (2012) AND TREVINO V. THALER 569 U.S.… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6714 |
In Re Rafael Verdejo-Ruiz |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process federal-jurisdiction ineffective-counsel military-appellate-review speedy-trial standing takings ucmj-jurisdiction |
I.
APPELLATE COURT LACKED JURISDICTION. IS PETITIONER'S APPEAL LEGALLY ADEQUATE? DUE PROCESS VIOLATION. IN LIGHT OF IN RE BUBER, 62 MJ 227 (CAAF 2015)… |
-4.5 |
| 21-5977 |
In Re Rigoberto Melero Aguirre |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constructive-denial counsel-rights criminal-procedure due-process fraud-on-the-court fraud-upon-court ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-proceedings miscarriage-of-justice plain-error-standard standard-of-review |
WHETHER THE CONSTRUCTIVE DENIAL OF COUNSEL DURING MELERO AGUIRRE'S JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, COUPLED WITH THE WHOLESALE ADOPTION BY THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, OF … |
-6.0 |
| 21-6050 |
James Bongiorno v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
abstract-idea cantrell-v-wallick electronic-unit functional-improvement hardware-structures machine machine-patent patent-eligibility section-101 |
Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter… |
-6.0 |
| 21-6277 |
Jordan Adonis Rawls v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-charges criminal-prosecution custodial-interrogation due-process miranda-warnings patterson-v-illinois police-disclosure sixth-amendment |
WHETHER POLICE, TO PROTECT A PERSON'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, MUST DO MORE THAN ADMINISTER MIRANDA WARNINGS WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IS SUBJECT TO POLICE C… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6303 |
C. K. J. v. M. J. T. |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights custody-proceedings due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct judicial-recusal protective-orders recusal standing |
1. Is it a violation of the Constitution for a judge to evaluate their own judge recusal and if they do should the case be vacated?
2. Is it unconsti… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6313 |
Glen Plourde v. Knox County, Maine, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction human-rights judicial-abuse judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-litigation standing torture-allegations |
1. "Does the well-evidenced fact that a sua sponte dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), and The Appeal's Court's subsequent upholding of that d… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6330 |
S. B. v. Florida Department of Children and Families, et al. |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure child-welfare civil-rights custody-requirements department-of-children-services due-process family-law judicial-procedure judicial-review |
WHAT ARE THE REQUITEMENTS BEFORE PLACING CHILDREN?
WAS 2BACKGROUND CHECKS DONE ON ALL PARTIES IN THIS CASE WHY?
WHY WASN'T A DNA TEST DONE?
WAS THE… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6359 |
Corey J. Zinman v. Nova Southeastern University, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure court-access federal-magistrate-judges injunctive-relief judicial-administration judicial-jurisdiction magistrate-judges statutory-authority |
1. Whether magistrate judges exceed the scope of their statutory authority by issuing orders which have the practical effect of granting or refusing i… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6422 |
Jake Rader v. Darrell Miller, Warden |
Virginia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus prisoner-rights standing |
ISSUES RAISED IN PETITONERS HABEAS WHICH CUUID OF BEEN RASED ON DIRECT APPEAL. THIS FIDIN'G ON ITS OWN SHOUID SUFFICE A VALID CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASS… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6439 |
John Joseph Rushinsky, Jr. v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice strickland-standard |
1. May the state, consistent with Due Process, sweepingly criminalize a broad range of conduct embracing both innocent and culpable behavior and assig… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6446 |
Khongsana Soumphonphakdy v. Mary J. Walilko, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction standing |
What would 'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' do to help people in a case like this?
Can 'THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' make a change… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6502 |
Bobby Griffin v. Connecticut |
Connecticut |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
coerced-confession coercive-interrogation constitutional-rights due-process exclusionary-rule false-confession fourth-amendment interrogation-tactics probable-cause warrantless-search |
1) Whether Griffins Constitutional rights were violated by the Trial courts admittance of the evidence (e.g the firearm) at the defendants trial. |
-6.5 |
| 21-6553 |
Chad L. Enderle v. Iowa |
Iowa |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process heemstra legal-retroactivity pending-appeals retroactive-application retroactive-availability statute-of-limitations supreme-court-precedent |
1) Do the federal Supreme Court cases issued subsequent to the Iowa cases determining the retroactive availability to Heemstra require the Iowa law to… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6701 |
Nakyia D. Parker v. Douglas Fender, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
consecutive-sentences constitutional-rights constructive-possession criminal-evidence due-process fair-trial jury-instructions motion-to-suppress sentencing-error sufficiency-of-evidence |
WHETHER PETITIONER-APPELLANT, PARKER WAS DENIED A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL DUE TO SEVERAL MAJOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND DUE PROCESS RIGHT VIOLATIONS THAT I… |
-6.5 |