Whether respondent waived/forfeited any of its procedural defenses

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | WHETHER RESPONDENT WAIVED/FORFEITED ANY OF IT’S PROCEDURAL | DEFENSES IN McGIRT’S DECISION AND RESPONDENT IS PROCEDURALLY | BARRED FROM ASSERTING ANY IF IT’S PREVIOUS PROCEDURAL DEFENSES THAT WERE AVAILABLE AGAINST PETITIONER’S SUBJECT MATTER | JURISDICTION CLAIM IN COLLATERAL POST CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS | WHEN CONVICTON WAS FINAL? . | | | WHETHER McGIRT V. OKLAHOMA ANNOUNCED A NEW VINDICATIVE : REPLACEMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RULE DICTATED BY PRIOR PRECEDENT ' MADE RETROACTIVE BY TEAGUE’S EXCEPTION TO NON-RETROACTIVITY? WHICH RESPONDENT REFUSED TO APPLY RETROACTIVELY AS STATE : POSTCONVICTION RELIEF TO CASES FINAL WHEN McGIRT WAS DECIDED ON JULY 09, 2020? WHETHER LACK OF TRIBES VOLUNTARY CONSENT TO STATE’S ASSUMPTION OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE ATEMPTED EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL POWER BY RESPONDENT WITHOUT TRIBE’S CONSENT IS VOID? ii