protective-orders
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-6967 | Steven Ward v. Thos D. Walsh, Inc., Realtors | District of Columbia | 2026-03-05 | Pending | IFP | due-process-clause eviction-proceedings jury-trial-rights protective-orders seventh-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction | 1. Whether the District of Columbia court violates the Due Process Clause of theFourteenth Amendment and the Seventh Amendment 's right to a jury tria… |
| 25-1038 | Edward Ronny Arnold v. Mountain Laural Assurance Company, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2026-03-03 | Pending | attorney-ethics due-process fourteenth-amendment insurance-coverage protective-orders service-of-process | 1. Whether the district court erred in not addressing defendant Deborah Malchow's December 29, 2023 default of service of civil action Edward Ronny Ar… | |
| 23-5234 | Cheryl Kristy Jenkins v. Mark Joseph Tengowski | Pennsylvania | 2023-07-28 | Denied | IFP | child-custody civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct protective-orders recusal standing | 1. Is it a violation of the Constitution for a judge to evaluate their own judge recusal and if they do should the case be vacated? 2. Is it unconsti… |
| 21-6303 | C. K. J. v. M. J. T. | Pennsylvania | 2021-11-17 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure constitutional-rights custody-proceedings due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct judicial-recusal protective-orders recusal standing | 1. Is it a violation of the Constitution for a judge to evaluate their own judge recusal and if they do should the case be vacated? 2. Is it unconsti… |
| 20-7867 | Howard Allen Groffel v. Virginia | Virginia | 2021-04-27 | Denied | IFP | constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy due-process firearm-possession firearms protective-order protective-orders status-crime status-crimes | Groffel was convicted five times for transporting one firearm in violation of five separate protective orders. This case poses a clear question of law… |