Whether the trial court failed to order a determination of the defendant's schizophrenia?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the trial court failed to order a determination of the defendant's schizophrenia? Whether a conviction that violates due process happened while the defendant was legally incompetent? Whether § 1331 federal question jurisdiction invokes F.R.E. R. 302 or 18 U.S.C. § 4241? 1 LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Conviction: July 19, 2011, a Douglas County jury found Mr. Turner guilty of one count of: (1) driving _ under the influence of alcohol; (2) driving with a blood alcohol concentration over .08. (D 6) Direct Appeal: January 25, 2013, Appellate Court Fourth District of Ilmois affirmed, in a Summary Order, People v. Turner, No. 4-11-0743; (C. 239, 316) May 29, 2013, Illinois Supreme Court denied leave to appeal, No. 115828, in People v. Turner, 39 N.E.3d 566 (Ill. 2013); November 18, 2013, U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Turner v. Illinois, No. 13-5344. (B 1) Collateral Attack: August 7, 2015, and April 2, 2018, Douglas County trial court denied relief from judgments; (R. 344; C. 471, 488-89, 491) January 9, 2018, Appellate Court Fourth District of Iinois vacated $1374.00 in clerk's statutory fees and otherwise affirmed in No. 4-15-0643, People v. Turner, 2018 Ill. App (4th) 150643-U and September 10, 2020, affirmed in No. 4-18-0251, People v. Turner, 2020 Tl. App (4th) 180251-U; (C. 476-82) (A 1-8) November 6, 2020, Iflinois Supreme Court denied mandamus and/or prohibition relief in No. 126490; (B 2) April 19, 2021, and May 6, 2021, U.S. District Court Central District of Illinois dismissed relief for mandamus or prohibition in No. 20-CV-2352, and prohibition in No. 21-CV-2087, due to a lack of jurisdiction. (B 2, 3) On July 27, 2021, U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit dismissed for failure to pay docking fees in Nos. 211929, and 21-1930. (A B) OPINIONS BELOW The Appellate Court Fourth District of Illinois, People v. Turner, 2018 Ill. App (4th) 150643-U and People v. Turner, 2020 Ill. App (4th) 180251-U. (A 1-8) JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Petitioner seeks review of federal orders and judgments of July 13, 2021. Petitioner invokes 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (1), § 1257 (a), and Amendment I. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND STATUTES Amendment XIV. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. 2 FRE R. 302, In a civil case, state law governs the effect of a presumption regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision. 18 U.S.C, § 4241 (Please see