No. 21-6317
Clayton G. Walker v. Steve Barnett, South Dakota Secretary of State, et al.
IFP
Tags: amendment-interpretation candidate-rights constitutional-access election election-rights equal-protection judicial-procedure jurisdiction mask-mandate writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-01-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (from Petition)
Questions Presented 1. Should everyone have the same Access During the Pandemic. 2. Should Walker as a Candidate for United States Sente be grated the same rights as other when it comes to a Pacer Account? 3. Are the rights of a candidate that is treated differently during an election, violate the equal protection clause of the 9" and 14° Amendment? 4. Was it Constitutional for our Governor Kristy Noem to be the only State that didn’t require Mask Mandates? 5. Weds meee Emer, Money BR Den th
Docket Entries
2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2021)