No. 21-6698

In Re Carlton West II

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process equitable-rule equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-rule prisoner-rights procedural-default standing trevino-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When and where can prisoners use the equitable rule announced in Martinez v. Ryan and Trevino v. Thaler?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION #1 EXACTLY HOW, WHEN AND WHERE ARE PRISONERS TO USE THE NOW EQUITABLE RULE ANNOUNCED IN MARTINEZ V. RYAN 566 U.S. 1 (2012) AND TREVINO V. THALER 569 U.S. 413 (2013)? GESTION #2 . DOES THE FACTS OF MY CASE QUALIFY FOR THE WEW EQUITABLE RULE OF MARTINEZ V. RYAN. SUPRA AND TREVINO V. THALER. SUPRA? _Z, . “el you pemoqve quote? soqmns pexin op fo ance sues otgl-c0# ‘IT 9804 woxmED at ut . 7 . LT apuecciny T008 oo “T-asntiy pareque quail yynama 199 syveddo fo m0o ‘sa O@et-O1# “IE 90m, worm aur Uh mypueddy) 0108 62 fixe parerna miewalont wobyo%N Jo aanoo sizing Levelt “TE 80M -a eqdoad —-*7Papuaddy) s00e 22 emp pareme qaulprt ywoctio fo sarco ‘whee “Ges06eH I 280 “a epdoeg Bo an ey gay ence. YI6T YorEN Dexeque queustint qanco qnono Tount ee, ‘ae-6/s6h-268 a4 san *a oqdoed ode | oe of moat 8008 “6 yom Paxeque quaunliont 31m snamo qoMRe Yad ‘ae-61s6P-264 IT 980m “a oydoog : Gy Xp 0h). hs Fanigg by YFG vetene viewlrt “uno%p wens wena £0 IoLTISI useqeen a2 sel ameO sR “Sn L80-CO-86:TK ‘OMA “a IT 350M a “/ mpuatliy) deer ‘se fine paxeqe queuelpr! unbryown fo yinco auaxing c2cor# “IT gem a oqdoa oo 966I'cr soowieg paweqe quaieby ‘sqreddn fo sano wOnem S199cI# “TL 380K ‘a endoag bb, -. (puapueieny) <(potouap fouior3y) NUBE-AESNETSTEEO “W VOX | ae ee (quopucdses) ‘AVOTEOIN 0 SIVIS SHE 5D SRI EL a ) . o (couraged) “Or ISM NOTED © reeonof 80 1 unanied a fo qoolens oye quoublt esau qanco ayn vy Buxpeocox a8 04 seqaund 170 Jo 38m ¥ “abcd cance ayy uo asco aa Jo wo}AD oY Wp aed 40u op segaad [IY In Fe Carlton West IT, #17-7618 Sumene court of the united states juigenent entered March 25, 2019 (Appendic O; ). West II v. Withrow, #1:98-cv-657 U.S. district court western district of 7 Michigan southarn division judgement entered October 22, 2020 (Appendia,B, ) . , In Fe Carlton West IT 420-2078, U.S. court of ampeal 6th cineuit judgenent entered My,1? 2001. | In Re Gavlton West IL, #20-2078 U.S. court of appeals 6th cireuit juigenent entered nly 7, 2021 "In Re Carlton West IT 420-2078 U.S. court of appeals 6th eirexit judgonent. entered August 18, 2021 (hepentiie D, ). | : "In Re Qurlton West IT #202078 U.S. Court of cgpeals Sth civeuit judment entered August 26, 0 2021 (Append: DD. ). a Sa | Jn Re Gatlton West II, 420-2078 U.S. court of appeal 6th ciewit judgenent entered October 1, . 20181 Ubppendi: D, ). Oo . : 7 : ‘ TABDE OF CONTENT . oe SUAIDEMT OF THE CASB.es, wenden’ em B. DECISTON OF TSE INTTED STAIRS DISIRICE COUR. o ae ae :

Docket Entries

2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-06
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Carlton West
Carlton West II — Petitioner
Carlton West II — Petitioner