If beneficiaries of the United States Constitution have the right to prosecute in their own name under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. If beneficiaries of the United States Constitution have the right to * prosecute in their own name under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution : protected by 42 USC § 1981 and in accordance with the 7, 9%, and 10% . amendments and evenly applied through the 14 amendment, then any judges/justices who are clearly ignoring or suppressing these rights . according to the supreme laws of the land are committing treason for any blockage, suppression, undo-influence, or coercion not fulfilling their oath of office? All judges/justices in petitioner’s case have violated 18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES, § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in a rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United, States or-the laws thereof (emphasis added), or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. : 2. Do Americans have the right to access their courts to prosecute. on their own behalf under the constitution and law already established 42 USC § 1981 for libel defamation? . 3. If petitioner is a beneficiary of the United States Constitution and the constitution being a binding legal contract, then paying $400 to the district court for a case that is free with no cost, is a contract with consideration between the court and the pro se litigant and if the pro se litigant paid for a venue to conduct a trial by jury and verdict shouldn’t the court provide its duty to the contract and the pro se constitutional beneficiary? 4. Do justices commit treason when they violate the constitutional jurisprudence when it is clearly written, unambiguously, or capriciously and in plain English? 5. Tf the Fourteenth Amendment provides equal protection at law and Dominion v. Lindell (1:2021cv00445/US District Court for the District of Columbia) is a defamation libel suit that is moving forward through the court then why has petitioner’s defamation libel suit not moved forward with service, discovery, and trial by jury? : { \$ of 4) :