Whether an attorney's failure to interview a defendant's requested witnesses due to a mistaken assumption of adversity constitutes a deficient investigation under Strickland,

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When an attorney currails her investigation and fails to Ihter view a defendants requested witnesses because the attorney bustakenly assumed the witnesses were adverse to the detendaty is the atterney’s /nvestigation Aeticient warranting & hare analy sis Under Strick lana? Should the Court of Appeals hare Considered the United Stutes Supreme Court Aeti's/on, Andrus V Texas when evaluating , Ape? Mant tlain ther his attrney provided inet tective assiStance of Counsel by Fa: ling to pertorm a thorough investigation? Whether the isswes presented belw were resolved correctly, that IS; in attordante with the applicable law