No. 21-6354

Erik Mishiyev v. Alphabet Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 1st-amendment censorship civil-rights content-moderation due-process first-amendment free-speech platform-liability standing youtube-censorship
Key Terms:
Copyright
Latest Conference: 2022-01-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit order allowed YouTube to deprive the Petitioner of his Due Process rights under the 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution, when YouTube censored the free speech of the Petitioner and terminated his YouTube channel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW e Whether The United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit Order allowed YouTube to deprive the Petitioner of his Due Process rights under the Ist Amendment of the United States Constitution, when YouTube censored the free speech of the Petitioner and terminated his YouTube channel? e Why is YouTube hiding crucial information? After years of trying to get problems with his channels fixed, Petitioner threatened YouTube with a lawsuit after their google chat reps were hiding some crucial information from him such as proof of if they were actually sending his new videos he uploads to his subscribers who wanted to be notified. YouTube said “We can’t share this information with you.” e Why does YouTube allow countless other DJ channels to post the same content as , petitioner without any penalties? ; \ |

Docket Entries

2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Erik Mishiyev
Erik Mishiyev — Petitioner