Whether the 11th Circuit can eliminate due process requirements of Qui Tam - relator progressed - case dismissals while other circuits rely on Sequoia Dismissal Standards?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW . . a Whether the 11" Circuit can eliminate due process requirements of Qui Tam — relator progressed — case dismissals while other circuits rely on Sequoia Dismissal . , : Standards? Whether the relator’s right can be abolished without judicial oversight, : . “without leave of court” dismissal, immediately divesting jurisdiction to review by all Courts. Raising the question of when the single-party of interest dismissal standard (Swift “Dismissal Standard”), and when the dual party of interest (Sequoia “Dismissal : Standard”) applies? Whether a cause of action is a protected property interest, whether : the duc process of relator’s right is federally mandated, and whether'the due process of an executive action over a judicial oversight case should be identical among Circuits (5 Amendment) and States (14" Amendment)? The question of who has the : jurisdiction to review the Fourteenth Amendment claim of a State False Claims Act ‘ ~ : case dismissal when a cause of action is extinguished without constitutional terms, : despite that the State and State Court gave right to the relator to proceed and scheduled . . : , the case for trial? ‘ yO. : ii