Whether a sentencing court adequately considers the mitigating aspects of youth

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a sentencing court adequately considers the mitigating aspects of youth where it considers at least some of those aspects to be aggravating. See Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 476 (2012); Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 116 (1982). 2. Whether a juvenile sentenced to die in prison before Miller, is entitled, after Miller, to present evidence that the punishment is unconstitutional as applied. 3. Whether Mr. Jackson’s sentence to die in prison is unconstitutionally disproportionate as applied in his case. See Jones v. Mississippi, 141 S. Ct. 1307, 1322 (2021). i