No. 21-6326

Farand Skinner v. Kentucky

Lower Court: Kentucky
Docketed: 2021-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment napue-v-illinois prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-01-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Kentucky Supreme Court violate Mr. Skinner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and issue a decision contrary to Brady-v-Maryland, Napue-v-Illinois, and their-progeny in refusing to find error in the prosecution's suppression-and-destruction-of-exculpatory-evidence, and the-government's-false-testimony-concerning-the-exculpatory-evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Kentucky Supreme Court violate Mr. Skinner's rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and issue a decision contrary to ° Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), and | ‘ their progeny in refusing to find error in the prosecution’s suppression and ; destruction of exculpatory evidence and the government’s false testimony concerning the exculpatory evidence?

Docket Entries

2022-01-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Farnad Skinner
Farand O. Skinner III — Petitioner