Was the defendant given a fair trial?

ESTION) PRESENTED a oe (1) Was DEFENDANT Given A FOIR Tia ? = @) JAS DEFENDANT Founp Cutty BEyono A ResonABLe Dougt 2 @ was DEFENgant Due process viofateo 2? | | . 3 WAS PERTHIED TEsrimeny GiuEN To coven oF The Thuth ? . DEFENDANT Sfouco DEFINATIY CET “Some For eek iE: a in OF REWEFLESECipuY PFTER ' WERE FAR MoRE SéRious THAN HIS IN PETITIONERS Facts fer PEOPLE O eouesn an mar hac beanie people Ui RIVERA, 201 TL Ape (24) 04)060 (Zell) 962 NE 2d §F,356 [Nl DEC. 709 , PEOPLE V. HERMAN, 407 IW. ARP. 3d E88 (2011) 4S NE. 2d 54, 346 [i DEC. 747 PESpLE V. Smith [65 Til. 2d 532 (1999) 7 108 Nie. 24 365, 236 INI-DEC 777 WHO WERE Chan TED SHE Foam OF RENEF, ConucTion in OVERTURNED, ETC. . By): . . O<cye turn NEVER CHANGES No MATTER How MANY years PASS. a LieS Ane ConSTANT AND Foreven cH@incinc. WHy Would L.0.CLamonich iLLARD) Lies So mactl ; ripe AW /oOSiNG Poficé POD CAMERA VIDEO THAT 0 SthTES ATTORNEY viele 9 BREOY + Pope pee i Day Di INTs onocencé: Aad GPR CEREAL MoGRESS RBORES_ THT HROdE ANE CINCS §) WHY WERE Se MANS AmengmenTs yrolaten 2 . ; No Diomice F Dy wily Vio Serres Voie speeoy Thou eam 2ano wy Diewt dye GkenT TION? PSMAS FOR yiowanion oF SPEEDY TRIAL (0) ANY cASE Twat WolATes mul teple viofATron S oF cspipetionh Amenoinen TS DEstRuEs Das Poessp LT? ()) uly DEFeNOMT Ls ZanocenT Chino 1.p.'s Peasonien Fésrimany Ane DEFEAIDANT UF Posepl CUSAP Aggie NT Mol Tift Fines puo The Bete wil Revel FTSECE. ). oo 7