Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Nevada Supreme Court, in conflict
with this Court's decision in Walden v. Fiore , 571 U.S.
277 (2014), and with decisions of the Texas Supreme
Court, the Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits,correctly held that a State may exercise specificpersonal jurisdiction over a defendant where thedefendant does not live or work in the State, and therelevant conduct occurred overseas, merely because thedefendant "aimed" his conduct at a resident of a Stateand was an officer of a corporation organized in theState?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Nevada Supreme Court correctly held that a State may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a defendant where the defendant does not live or work in the State, and the relevant conduct occurred overseas, merely because the defendant 'aimed' his conduct at a resident of a State and was an officer of a corporation organized in the State?
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-14
Reply of petitioner Ralph Lewis filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-27
Brief of respondents Power Research, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2021-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 27, 2022.
2021-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 27, 2021 to January 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2021.
2021-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2021 to December 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-27
Response Requested. (Due November 26, 2021)
2021-10-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent Power Research, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2021)