No. 21-5056

Arthur Vincent v. AutoZone

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights civil-rights-act discipline eeoc employment-discrimination harassment job-assignment retaliation title-vii workplace-harassment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether AutoZone violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 through negligent harassment, discipline, discharge, job assignments, promotions, and retaliation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED AutoZone, Defendant, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. AutoZone negligently violated EEOC Laws Under Civil Rights Act of 1964, in regards to Harassment, Discipline and Discharge, Job Assignments and Promotions, Retaliation.

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Autozone to respond filed.
2021-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Arthur Vincent
Arthur Vincent — Petitioner
Autozone
George J. OliverFox Rothschild LLP, Respondent