Why did the District Court overlook the affidavit attached that showed proof that Respondent had more than 15 employees for the purpose of Title VII?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Why did the District Court overlook the affidavit attached that showed proof that Respondent had more than 15 employees for the purpose of Title VII? 2. Why did the District Court also overlooked the contract it had with ADP that instituted more employees? | | 3. Why did the Respondent pay other employees on a separate corporate account and those employees were not listed on their payroll records that was submitted to the court? 4, Why did Respondent claim to have laid me off stating they were experiencing a hard ship after their yearly financial statement for the relevant years did not indicate they were experiencing a hardship? 5. Rule 60(b)(3) applied to Respondent for Fraud and it was not accepted by the court and for what reason? 415, |