No. 21-5186

Mihran Melkonyan v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law auer-deference circuit-split deference federal-courts judicial-interpretation regulatory-interpretation sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Auer deference applies to the Sentencing Guidelines

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1.) Whether, as the Courts of Appeals for the Third' and Sixth Circuits have held, in conflict with the decision below’ and decisions of the Fifth* and Eleventh’ Circuits, this Court’s ' Kisor® decision proscribes the federal courts from granting “Auer’ deference” to the Commentary and Application Notes to the Sentencing Guidelines only if a regulation is genuinely ambiguous and, even then, not when the réasons for that presumption do not apply or when countervailing reasons outweigh them? ' United States v. Nasir, 982 F.3d 144 * | 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37489 ** (3 Cir, 12-1-20). ? See United States v. Riccardi, 989 F.3d 476, 484 (6" Cir. 2021). > United States v. Melkonyan, 831 Fed. Appx. 319-320; 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39305 **2 (9 Cir, 12-15-20). (

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Mihran Melkonyan
Mihran Melkonyan — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent