No. 21-522

Michael Simko v. United States Steel Corporation

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-procedure civil-action civil-rights eeoc eeoc-charge employment employment-discrimination retaliation retaliation-claim title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a claim of unlawful retaliation for filing an EEOC charge can be addressed in a civil action without a second formal administrative charge

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, or under what circumstances, a claim that an employer unlawfully retaliated against an employee for filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC under the remedial structure of Title VII may be addressed in an ensuing civil action, if the employee did not file a second formal administrative charge specifically alleging the retaliation.

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-21
Reply of petitioner Michael Simko filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-08
Brief of respondent United States Steel Corp. in opposition filed.
2021-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-10-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Michael Simko
John E. Egers Jr.Julian Law Firm, Petitioner
John E. Egers Jr.Julian Law Firm, Petitioner
United States Steel Corp.
Leon F. DeJulius Jr.Jones Day, Respondent
Leon F. DeJulius Jr.Jones Day, Respondent