Floyd Flugence v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of guilt in accordance with La. B.S. 14:30.1 (Second Degree Murder) where there was no specific intent to kill?
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of guilt in accordance with La. B.S. 14:30.1 (Second Degree Murder) where there was no specific intent to kill? : 2. Was there a constructive denial of Petitioner's right to present. a defense? 3. Did the trial court create manifest error by: , : (a) allowing the jury (during deliberations} to review a videotape? (b) —s madifying the video to slow motion? 7 4, Tn playing the video in slow motion, did the jury review a different form ofthe events with a different time frame of the events? 7 5. Whether the Petitioner's 6" and 14% Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated in the use of La. C.OrF Art. 413(B)? &. Is La. C.CrP. Art. 413(B) in violation of the United States Constitution? ; 7. Whether Counsel was ineffective in violation of the 6" Amendment te the United States Constitution? 8. Dud Petitioner suffer a Due Process violation in the lengthy delays? : 9. Is an indictment sufficient when if fails to allege the elements of fhe crime? 10. Can a Defendant present a proper defense when the indichnent fails to give notification of the alleged crime? oo isrowrartes [ ] All parties appear im the caption of the case on the cover page. [X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all