No. 21-5689
Harold V. Hoskins v. Kevin Kauffman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to be represented by counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WAS THE PETITIONER DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL AS MEANT BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND — . DID THE ACTIONS OF "ALL" COUNSEL INVOLVED DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT] right|] AND DUE PROCESS ~ OF LAW AS PER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS ? AS A RESULT OF THE INEFFECTIVENESS OF "ALL" COUNSEL WAS THE PETITIONER DEPRIVED OF A FAIR TRIAL ? . i Co Soe .
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Harold Hoskins
Harold Hoskins — Petitioner