This Court should resolve the circuit split that has developed by finding that the twelve-level terrorism enhancement under U.S.S.G. §3A1.4 requires a finding of specific intent pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2332B(g)(5)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: This Court should resolve the circuit split that has developed by finding that the twelve-level terrorism enhancement under U.S.S.G. §3A1.4 requires a finding of specific intent pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2332B(g)(5). Question 2: Imposing a_ twelve-level terrorism enhancement, automatically making a defendant’s criminal history a category VI, on a criminal defendant when the underlying elements of the crime were not established by proof beyond a reasonable doubt is incongruous to this Court’s holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000). STATEMENT REGARDING PARTIES TO THE CASE The names of all parties to the case are contained in the caption of the case. Rahim Petition for Writ ofCertiorari = —iti(‘Sé! él