No. 21-605
David Lynn Roberson v. United States
Tags: bribery bribery-prosecution circuit-split civil-rights due-process federal-programs first-amendment free-speech issue-advocacy official-action quid-pro-quo
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity FirstAmendment
Environmental SocialSecurity FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Related Cases:
21-706
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government must prove explicit link between issue-advocacy payments and official action in bribery prosecution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in a bribery prosecution based on issue-advocacy payments that would otherwise enjoy First Amendment protection, the government must prove that the payments were explicitly linked to official action. 2. Whether ajury must be instructed that merely “expressing support” for a policy cannot support conviction under the federal bribery laws.
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-11
Reply of petitioner David Lynn Roberson filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2021.
2021-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2021 to December 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
Attorneys
David Lynn Roberson
Jacob Moshe Roth — Jones Day, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent