No. 21-706
Joel Iverson Gilbert v. United States
Tags: bribery bribery-statute federal-bribery-laws first-amendment issue-advocacy jury-instruction jury-instructions official-action prosecutorial-standard
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Related Cases:
21-605
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government must prove explicit link between issue-advocacy payments and official action in bribery prosecution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in a bribery prosecution based on issue-advocacy payments that would otherwise enjoy First Amendment protection, the Government must prove that the payments were explicitly linked to official action. 2. Whether a jury must be instructed that merely “expressing support” for a policy cannot support conviction under the federal bribery laws.
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2022.
2021-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2021 to January 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Joel Gilbert
Jeffrey Paul Doss — Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC, Petitioner
Jeffrey Paul Doss — Lightfoot, Franklin & White, LLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent