No. 21-6055
Willie B. Smith, III v. Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: accommodation ada ada-accommodation civil-rights cognitive-disability due-process execution-method nitrogen-hypoxia prison-rights standing statutory-deadline
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the threshold of evidence required for a cognitively disabled petitioner to establish that his need for accommodation was obvious under the ADA?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED What is the threshold of evidence required for a cognitively disabled petitioner to establish that his need for accommodation was obvious under the ADA? i
Docket Entries
2021-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
2021-10-21
Application (21A99) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2021-10-21
Brief of respondent Jefferson Dunn, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-10-21
Application (21A99) referred to the Court.
2021-10-21
Reply of petitioner Willie B. Smith, III filed.
2021-10-21
Application (21A99) denied by the Court. Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting denial of the application for stay. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a99_1an2.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2021-10-21
Petition DENIED.
Attorneys
Jefferson Dunn, et al.
Edmund Gerard LaCour Jr. — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Willie B. Smith, III
John Anthony Palombi — Federal Defenders, Petitioner