No. 21-6081

Gerund Mickens, aka Breeze v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland confrontation-clause criminal-investigation due-process evidence-preservation fifth-amendment sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Related Cases: 21-6091 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment require the federal government, when conducting a criminal investigation, to memorialize or otherwise preserve information it obtains that clearly falls within the scope of Brady and that cannot contemporaneously be conveyed to a defendant

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment and require the federal government, when conducting a criminal investigation, to memorialize or otherwise preserve information it obtains that clearly falls within the scope of Brady and that cannot contemporaneously be conveyed to a defendant. i

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Gerund Mickens
James P. MaguireOffice of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent