No. 21-6091

Harold Cook v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland criminal-investigation criminal-procedure disclosure-requirements due-process exculpatory-evidence prosecutorial-duty witness-statement witness-statements
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Related Cases: 21-6081 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny require the prosecution to create a record of and preserve apparently exculpatory witness statements in a criminal investigation

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WHETHER BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) AND ITS PROGRENY REQUIRE THE PROSECUTION TO CREATE A RECORD OF AND PRESERVE APPARENTLY EXCULPATORY WITNESS STATEMENTS IN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. i

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Harold Cook
Erica BarberFrost Bussert LLC, Petitioner
Erica BarberFrost Bussert LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent