No. 21-6196

I. A. v. Kansas

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2021-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance legal-representation right-to-appeal standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-03-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did I.A. have a Fourteenth Amendment right to be informed of his right to appeal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did I.A. have a Fourteenth Amendment Right to have a District Court Judge inform him of his right to appeal? ' 2. Was 1.A’s trial attorney, Scott Wasserman, ineffective for not advising and . consulting I.A. of his right to appeal? ; 3. Was I.A.’s appellate attorney, Michael Bartee, ineffective for not raising the third exception to Ortiz on I.A.’s Appeal? : : ;

Docket Entries

2022-03-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-02-09
Reply of petitioner I. A. filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-28
Brief of respondent Kansas in opposition filed.
2021-12-29
Response Requested. (Due January 28, 2022)
2021-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2021)

Attorneys

I. A.
Isaac Allen — Petitioner
Kansas
Brant M. LaueSolicitor General of Kansas, Respondent