Whether the petitioner's due process rights under the U.S. Constitution were violated by the state's refusal to allow him to remain silent at trial

No question identified. : , Question, Fresiwrics f. L445 Carmo wEALTM or WieCrnirsa iw Cottier wit A Néasiew OF FHS Qcat HHEW PoLiele To . Con TIME Te Qeésrron PETIT en ire (ITER WE oa _ 5 Ex PAESSED THE MEE off Ar Airtepwty fase | Viol ATING (Eritiovcees V Alo fryer OV THE | U. 5. ConsryTuTion Te KemAiw Siew Fed oT lwerin rw ATIC, Hes ELF ? von Faaries Avy Rewate List oF [AaTIES SIND BELATED CAS £5 bist OF ee Oe eS Ir Com cei Aw CE wyTH Keg 126 oF THIS Gort Ace frases Thar ORe REPRESERTED MIRAE Awd ae3ocan we THE Carrion Of THE CASE, | Cases Diaeerer Reiaren Te Tye Case ie tas Looe: } 1 (Laer VLE CRLE V5. [38. Kawomse } YS, Duster Covat Ensrean Nisrrect OF VieGii9, Cw “Rte fo. BIN4 Cy 504, 3°A1-AO7e A. ere Var GBLé VAkS KAodé, U.S. Quart oF (1 AegALs yr Creceit, Mo. 22-6994, VPO Zeal | . TeaLe oF Contin rs ; TABLE Of Pe tHoRITIES V Oririers Bétow 1 ; TJuraishic Vor’ 2 Const Te Tie Ad SiATU Tory FRovision $ InvoevesTH STATE MET of THE Cnsé 3-6 Resor ® For Grant THE WRIT 6 Questor Oné: /. CorrlicTS with Necsions of THIS Qear -G B. TerertAr ce OF Qvu£kStiow Feésepreénr -~ 7 C.. Gow FLIETS with THE U.S, Grstirenon CopekUSiow Conetusionw q Pook or SERVICE 1o DepenriX fi: Kg UneausHes Deeisun of YU. S. Goer oF MlEptats _ Fer THE 4TH Cypewrr. ever x: eee DeesiorY oF THE Un iTéd Sywres israer Lov ar Loo Tne Easremu Misteice oF Vie6 1179 Peverrix ©: eae JEFIDAVIT . _ Il . (Const ireTonal fires SMTUATS RY [Feowi Si onv> Jrveewed Umir£o STATES (ow sri ru rien At /ierewo rater V , Po Eason Shae Re Herr Te Aeswte for. (9 CaeirAl C7 OTHERWISE IW FAMOLS Came UvLéss ov A ResEentTrertT or lwNiet men of 7 GRA® Serv Exvckier I~ Cases yw THE Lae® 92 MAWAL FeRces, OF IN CNT, WHEN IW frerw+ SeavicE i Time olf WAR OF 2 aut SAGER) (Vor SHALL Dre? [ERSer BE vi ~ . SuBseeT FoR THE SAME OFF EMSE Te Be Tore ec Corecued 0 Mr Carminnat Case Te De f) wit Ves AGgareet Jia sber, or Be Dere\ven or LiFe LIBERTY, off f0PEeTT, WwiITHoOeT Bue FroCESS OF LAw; hoe SHALL fra vwAtTe [~oPERTY (Be TAKE) foe eBule Use, WITHoeT Sosr GmrEWsATieor, _ Cases : FaceG) rkgavea V5. faizowA, 34 US. 7136/6 Led ad 6494, +6 Set /602. (1466) 6 a AaizonvA, 377, U.S. 436 (19466 7 [laizowA, . _ 7 Uni re STATES low sriterio At [lerers (Vers fArrévism Ent V -7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW | eh For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at