No. 21-6369
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea judicial-discretion judicial-oversight plea-bargaining plea-canvass record-development
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the judge err in accepting the defendant's guilty plea without asking him about the contradictory statements?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Judges must ensure defendants fully understand the consequences of their guilty pleas. Boykin v. Alabama requires judges to use “the utmost solicitude of which courts are capable in canvassing the matter with the accused.” And judges must make the record show the defendant’s plea was knowing. Here, the defendant initialed several contradictory statements in his plea papers. Did the judge err in accepting the defendant’s guilty plea without asking him about the contradictory statements? 2
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeremy Denson
Theodore Lee Wood — Harris County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Theodore Lee Wood — Harris County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Texas