No. 21-6369

Jeremy Denson v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2021-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea judicial-discretion judicial-oversight plea-bargaining plea-canvass record-development
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the judge err in accepting the defendant's guilty plea without asking him about the contradictory statements?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Judges must ensure defendants fully understand the consequences of their guilty pleas. Boykin v. Alabama requires judges to use “the utmost solicitude of which courts are capable in canvassing the matter with the accused.” And judges must make the record show the defendant’s plea was knowing. Here, the defendant initialed several contradictory statements in his plea papers. Did the judge err in accepting the defendant’s guilty plea without asking him about the contradictory statements? 2

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2021-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Jeremy Denson
Theodore Lee WoodHarris County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Theodore Lee WoodHarris County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Texas
Melissa Hervey StrykerHarris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Melissa Hervey StrykerHarris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent