| 23-5239 |
Samuel Trelawney Hughes v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
autism-spectrum-disorder boykin boykin-standard change-of-plea cognitive-deficiencies cognitive-deficiency criminal-procedure district-court-record due-process plea-hearing |
Did the Ninth Circuit's rejecting Petitioner's due-process claim regarding his change-of-plea hearing conflict with Boykin-and-its-progeny, particular… |
| 22-7057 |
Raymond Pniewski, Jr. v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-03-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights court-advisement due-process guilty-plea involuntary-plea judicial-procedure people-v-jaworski |
Do the rulings of Boykin v. Alabama and People v. Jaworski violate the petitioner's constitutional and due process rights by requiring the court to ad… |
| 21-8125 |
Carlos Montano v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-06-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
boykin-standard change-of-plea-hearing constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process felony-conviction ninth-circuit plea-bargaining plea-hearing substance-abuse |
did-the-ninth-circuit-overlook-boykin-and-its-progeny |
| 21-6369 |
Jeremy Denson v. Texas |
Texas |
2021-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea judicial-discretion judicial-oversight plea-bargaining plea-canvass record-development |
Did the judge err in accepting the defendant's guilty plea without asking him about the contradictory statements? |
| 19-6627 |
Andre Williamson v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama due-process equal-protection judicial-fairness mental-health mental-health-defendant mental-health-defendants plea-agreement plea-agreements plea-bargaining sentencing strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Will the Supreme Court re-affirm Boykin v. Alabama and Strickland v. Washington for mentally challenged defendants? |