No. 22-7057
Raymond Pniewski, Jr. v. Fredeane Artis, Acting Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boykin-standard boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights court-advisement due-process guilty-plea involuntary-plea judicial-procedure people-v-jaworski
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the rulings of Boykin v. Alabama and People v. Jaworski violate the petitioner's constitutional and due process rights by requiring the court to advise a defendant of only three of the many critical constitutional rights waived when pleading guilty, making the plea unknowing and involuntary?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2023-08-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED.
2023-05-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent Fredeane Artis, Warden to respond filed.
2023-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Fredeane Artis, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent