Whether judicial precedent concerning double jeopardy defines an acquittal to encompass any ruling that the prosecutions proof is insufficient to establish criminal liability for an offense once jeopardy has attached

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether judicial precedent concerning double jeopardy defines an acquittal to encompass any ruling that the prosecutions proof is insufficient to establish criminal liability for an offense once jeopardy has attached. 2. Whether because the Federal District Judge instructed the petit jury to disregard the preliminary jury instructions regarding count ané and count two's “aiding and abetting" theory for Hobbs Act robbery, count one, and carry, use, or possession of a firearm in futherance of the crime in count one, count two, because there was no evidence that the merely aided Andre Decker and Antonio Castro and thus deleted "aiding and abetting," 18 U.S.C. § 2(a) violates double jeopardy under the Fifth Amendment for conviction for aiding and abetting, count one and count two. i