No. 21-7272
Delila Uwasomba v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights corporate-misconduct due-process employment-discrimination employment-interference financial-burden financial-harm job-security judicial-review legal-remedy standing wrongful-termination
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal and Circuit Court erred in finding it acceptable for Bank of America and its affiliates to remove the petitioner from their position with Wells Fargo and not restore their job security
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Why does the Federal and Circuit Court think it’s acceptable for Bank of America and its affiliates to remove me from my position with Wells Fargo and not restore my job security? Why does the Federal and Circuit Court think it is acceptable for my babies and | to bear the financial burden from Bank of America and its affiliates?
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. to respond filed.
2022-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Delila Uwasomba
Delila Uwasomba — Petitioner
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Elena D. Marcuss — McGuire Woods, LLP, Respondent