No. 21-7361
Terry G. Watson v. Karey L. Witty, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: ada administrative-procedure disability-accommodation federal-preemption health-care incarceration supremacy-clause title-38 title-38-benefits veterans-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a veteran's statutory rights under Title 38 are upheld by a state corrections department under the Supremacy Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-02-22
Motion (21M64) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2022-01-12
MOTION (21M64) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-11
Motion (21M64) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2022-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2022)
Attorneys
Terry G. Watson
Terry G. Watson — Petitioner