| 23-7757 |
Pacita D. Whatley, et al. v. Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights disability-rights due-process elder-care federal-jurisdiction health-care healthcare-protections protective-measures |
Does the Constitution provide protected elder citizen rights for health care? |
| 23-1076 |
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-03 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
emergency-medical-treatment federal-preemption health-care healthcare-law labor-act medical-emergency patient-stabilization preemption reproductive-rights state-law |
Whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act preempts state law in the narrow circumstance where terminating a pregnancy is required to stabi… |
| 23-6235 |
John S. Romero, aka John Silva Romero v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-12-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bargained-for-product district-court embezzlement federal-question health-care health-care-embezzlement insurance-coverage restitution victim-compensation victims |
Whether a district court may award restitution in a health care embezzlement case where all of the alleged victims received the product they bargained… |
| 22-5075 |
Courtney Newman v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-07-12 |
GVR |
IFP |
controlled-substances criminal-intent criminal-law health-care jury-instruction medical-practice prescription-drugs prescription-law ruan-v-united-states statutory-interpretation |
Whether an authorized physician or health care professional can be convicted under 21-U.S.C-§856(a)(1) if the sole allegation of unlawful activity is … |
| 22-5076 |
Holli Womack v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-07-12 |
GVR |
IFP |
constitutional-vagueness controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-law criminal-liability due-process health-care health-care-professional professional-liability ruan-v-united-states statutory-interpretation vagueness |
Should Petition Womack's conviction be vacated? |
| 21-7361 |
Terry G. Watson v. Karey L. Witty, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-03-14 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
ada administrative-procedure disability-accommodation federal-preemption health-care incarceration supremacy-clause title-38 title-38-benefits veterans-rights |
Whether a veteran's statutory rights under Title 38 are upheld by a state corrections department under the Supremacy Clause |
| 21-6309 |
Patrick Andrew Smith, Jr. v. William Paul Nichols, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-11-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process health-care healthcare-regulations medical-records prescription-guidelines search-and-seizure strict-scrutiny unsettled-area-of-law |
Where the plaintiff's fundamental right to medical treatment is violated |
| 20-5017 |
Jerry Glendon Modisette v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-07-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-tort-claims-act health-care pleading-requirements |
Question not identified |
| 19-8166 |
Anthony Williams v. Muhammad Naji, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-04-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process health-care hepatitis-c imminent-danger medical-neglect prison prison-healthcare standing |
Did the court of appeals decision conflict with decisions made by the U.S. district court regarding imminent danger and does hepatitis-C create immine… |
| 18-8780 |
John T. Higgins v. Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance |
First Circuit |
2019-04-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
affordable-care-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process health-care individual-mandate standing |
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding that the petitioners lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's indivi… |
| 18-1192 |
The Little Sisters of the Poor Jeanne Jugan Residence v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act constitutional-rights contraceptive-coverage contraceptive-mandate government-mandate government-regulation health-care health-plans healthcare-coverage healthcare-law interim-final-rules national-importance religious-exemption religious-exemptions religious-freedom-restoration-act religious-objection standing |
Whether RFRA requires the government to exempt religious objectors from providing health plans that include contraceptive coverage |
| 18-1028 |
Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (6)Relisted (2) |
appropriations appropriations-riders bait-and-switch federal-circuit government-contracts government-obligation health-care health-exchanges health-insurance insurance statutory-commitment statutory-interpretation statutory-promise takings |
Whether Congress can evade its unambiguous statutory promise to pay health insurers for losses already incurred simply by enacting appropriations ride… |