No. 21-7373
Steven M. Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: coram-nobis court-martial due-process legal-representation military-justice post-conviction post-conviction-relief standing writ-of-coram-nobis
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner received full and fair consideration in the military justice system
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether or not Petitioner received full and fair consideration in the military justice system when his post-conviction efforts were summarily denied due to lack of counsel. 2. Whether or not it is a violation of due process for a military inmate to not be | able to use a writ of coram nobis while imprisoned when his court-martial court has been dissolved. | 2
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II to respond filed.
2022-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Steven Chapman
Darlene Calzon Barror — Law Office of Darlene Calzon Barror, Petitioner
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent