No. 21-7375
Rodolfo Rodriguez, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-review consensual-encounter consent criminal-procedure investigative-detention investigative-stop law-enforcement-interaction search-and-seizure standard-of-review voluntary-consent
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate standard to be applied in determining whether an encounter with police was consensual or an investigative stop?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. What is the appropriate standard to be applied in determining whether an encounter with police was consensual or an investigative stop? 2. Whether a law enforcement officer can continue to pursue a consensual encounter after an individual has attempted to terminate the contact? 3. What is the appropriate appellate standard of review for determining whether an individual has voluntarily given consent to a law enforcement officer to continue an encounter and to conduct a search and seizure? ii
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Rodolfo Rodriguez, Jr
Jerry Allen Walz — Walz & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
Jerry Allen Walz — Walz & Associates, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent