No. 21-7466

Anthony Aanand Patel v. Sonya Bhatia Patel

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-03-25
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights congress due-process federal-judges judicial-misconduct judicial-resignation legal-education mandatory-legal-education martial-law national-security standing
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

why-does-wasting-appellant's-time-prove-mandatory-continuing-legal-education

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Why does wasting Appellant’s time in this sixth (6th) request for relief in this Court in less than 12 months prove that all judges in the United States of America require mandatory continuing legal education (MCLE) as dictated by U.S. Congress? 2. Why must the U.S. Department of Defense grant prior approval in the interests of National Security before any federal or state judge may ever issue any further rulings again in the United States of America? 3. Why must the 46th Commander in Chief declare Martial Law once this Court ignored Appellant five times past? 4, Why will Orders always be given by the President and Vice President to federal judges who waste Appellant’s time? 5. Why does Justice Breyer know the law best among judges in America since December 12, 2000, and is thus, doing the only useful thing a judicial officer can do now by resigning? 6. Why did the California Supreme Court and lower courts not care that over 130 corrupt federal judges broke the law | for at least a decade (or more)? 7. Why is Respondent (Sonya Bhatia, Esq.) an Unfit Parent for the last 10 years because she complies with judges of this Court rather than every Congress and President since 1789? 8. Why is the only useful thing by this Court in 2022 the | attempted recitation of The Gettysburg Address on January 27? | 9. Why will U.S. Military Law explain that Congress and the Executive Branch are Divorcing Every Judge in America , as soon as any judge wastes a moment of Appellant’s time? | 2 Petition for Writ Certiorari and DOD Mandate for Judges __

Docket Entries

2022-05-31
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2022)

Attorneys

Anthony A. Patel
Anthony A. Patel — Petitioner