No. 21-7585
Jayson McNeil v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment motion-to-suppress search-and-seizure traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Trial Court err in denial of the Petitioner's Motion to Suppress evidence from a traffic stop and resulting search and seizure that was unconstitutional in scope and duration, in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Trial Court err in denial of the Petitioner’s Motion to Suppress evidence from a traffic stop and resulting search and seizure that was unconstitutional in scope and duration, in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Jayson McNeil
Robert L. McClellan — Ivey, Ivey, et al., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent